Re: FW: Question about logging.
From: Peter Pentchev (roam_at_ringlet.net)
Date: 05/28/03
- Previous message: Erik Paulsen Skålerud: "RE: FW: Question about logging."
- In reply to: Simon L. Nielsen: "Re: FW: Question about logging."
- Next in thread: Simon L. Nielsen: "Re: FW: Question about logging."
- Reply: Simon L. Nielsen: "Re: FW: Question about logging."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 23:04:32 +0300 To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@nitro.dk>
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 08:36:24PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2003.05.28 20:04:28 +0200, Erik Paulsen Sk?lerud wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I've gotten that far. But, how can I explicity -only- filter out ipfw
> > messages from the default console output? Looks like the only way is to
> > remove kern.debug :(
>
> I think you can use something like this in syslog.conf (untested) :
>
> !-ipfw
> *.err;kern.debug;auth.notice;mail.crit /dev/console
This would match log entries generated by a userland application named
'ipfw'. The ipfw log lines are, however, generated by the *kernel*, and
they would never match this rule.
> Or something along those lines...
Logging kern.security to a separate file should be enough, I think?
Never tried it, though.
> Try looking at syslog.conf(5), it does explain a lot.
Yep, that too :)
G'luck,
Peter
-- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 This would easier understand fewer had omitted.
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Erik Paulsen Skålerud: "RE: FW: Question about logging."
- In reply to: Simon L. Nielsen: "Re: FW: Question about logging."
- Next in thread: Simon L. Nielsen: "Re: FW: Question about logging."
- Reply: Simon L. Nielsen: "Re: FW: Question about logging."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|