Re: fstack protector
From: Stuart Anderson (anderson@netsweng.com)
Date: 04/18/03
- Previous message: Mark Murray: "Re: How often should an encrypted session be rekeyed?"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: fstack protector"
- Next in thread: Uwe Doering: "Re: fstack protector"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:38:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Stuart Anderson <anderson@netsweng.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> That's the best solution for FreeBSD. You'd just set CC and CFLAGS if
> you want to build with it, as usual. Be aware that some ports will
> not run when built with -fstack-protector, last time I checked
> (XFree86 is one).
Do you recall what the problem is with XFree86? Is it client side, or in
the server? My guess would be that some additional runtime support is needed
in the module loader in the server.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson anderson@netsweng.com
Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/
1024D/37A79149: 0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Mark Murray: "Re: How often should an encrypted session be rekeyed?"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: fstack protector"
- Next in thread: Uwe Doering: "Re: fstack protector"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
