Re: Limiting icmp unreach response from 231 to 200 packets per second
From: Sergei Kolobov (sergei@kolobov.com)
Date: 01/27/03
- Next message: Erik Paulsen Skålerud: "RE: Limiting icmp unreach response from 231 to 200 packets per second"
- Previous message: Gerhard Sittig: "Re: Limiting icmp unreach response from 231 to 200 packets per second"
- In reply to: Mike Hoskins: "Re: Limiting icmp unreach response from 231 to 200 packets per second"
- Next in thread: Erik Paulsen Skålerud: "RE: Limiting icmp unreach response from 231 to 200 packets per second"
- Reply: Erik Paulsen Skålerud: "RE: Limiting icmp unreach response from 231 to 200 packets per second"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:29:31 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov <sergei@kolobov.com> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
On 2003-01-22 at 11:27 -0800, Mike Hoskins wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ronan Lucio wrote:
> > I think a good solution is install a DJB DNS Cache and leave it
> > just to answer DNS queries.
>
> If you can stand DJB's rhetoric. Sure, he seems like a smart enough
> guy... If he wasn't such an a$$. I guess that's a problem with a lot of
> "smart" people though.
Do you care about DJB's personality? Do you use BIND just because you
like Paul Vixie's personality? or Sendmail because it was created by
Eric Allman? Do you use Windows (hmm..) because you went to the same
primary school as Bill Gates? ;-)
One thing I cannot get is why some people do not even want to consider
DJB software just because they do not like his "personality"?
IMHO, as long as djbdns/qmail/etc. does its job the way I want, I do
not care a bit what kind of person Dan is. That's something completely
irrelevant.
Sergei
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Erik Paulsen Skålerud: "RE: Limiting icmp unreach response from 231 to 200 packets per second"
- Previous message: Gerhard Sittig: "Re: Limiting icmp unreach response from 231 to 200 packets per second"
- In reply to: Mike Hoskins: "Re: Limiting icmp unreach response from 231 to 200 packets per second"
- Next in thread: Erik Paulsen Skålerud: "RE: Limiting icmp unreach response from 231 to 200 packets per second"
- Reply: Erik Paulsen Skålerud: "RE: Limiting icmp unreach response from 231 to 200 packets per second"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|