Re: [security-advisories@freebsd.org: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:44.filedesc]

From: horcy (apehaar@text-only.demon.nl)
Date: 01/08/03 

From: "horcy" <apehaar@text-only.demon.nl>
To: "budsz" <budsz@kumprang.or.id>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 17:45:19 +0100

>Ok, so I'am only recompile kernel and fix that problem.

Yup.
But if you were planning to do a cvsup this week.
Why not do it now.
Saves you some time because the cvsup will contain the patch too ;)

horcy

----- Original Message -----
From: "budsz" <budsz@kumprang.or.id>
To: "horcy" <apehaar@text-only.demon.nl>
Cc: "FreeBSD-Security" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [security-advisories@freebsd.org: FreeBSD Security Advisory
FreeBSD-SA-02:44.filedesc]

On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:25:20PM +0100, horcy wrote:
>The question:
>
>If I periodicly upgrade with cvsup stable and compile kernel it's will fix
>that problem, or I must patch only. does cvsup will replace all of
>source?
>---------------------------
>Answer:
>
>if you cvsup to stable it will fix it and of course the patch will fix it.
>But you still have to recompile you kernel, so to if it was time for your
>cvsup stable then i sould suggest you do that. Both will take some time.
>So i would go for the cvsup.

Ok, so I'am only recompile kernel and fix that problem. 

--
budsz
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message

Relevant Pages