Re: File table exhaustion patch
From: David G. Andersen (danderse@cs.utah.edu)
Date: 11/22/02
- Next message: Alex Povolotsky: "Re: jailed virtual https, anyone?"
- Previous message: quak@mydiax.ch: "Re: jailed virtual https, anyone?"
- In reply to: Sheldon Hearn: "Re: File table exhaustion patch"
- Next in thread: David Schultz: "Re: File table exhaustion patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 05:40:05 -0700 From: "David G. Andersen" <danderse@cs.utah.edu> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Sheldon Hearn just mooed:
> On (2002/11/21 15:29), Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> > HOWEVER, we're in a code freeze leading up to 5.0-release, and local DoSes
> > aren't a critical bug.
>
> Is that the official FreeBSD SO team viewpoint on local DoS
> vulnerabilities?
Well, keep in mind that this isn't really a bad one - it doesn't
crash the machine, and it's moderately easy to identify the (l)user who's
doing it. I've actually not seen this happen maliciously, I've only
seen it happen by accident with buggy research code, some of it mine.
It's annoying when it happens, but there are a million things a local
user can do to be annoying.
-Dave
-- work: dga@lcs.mit.edu me: dga@pobox.com MIT Laboratory for Computer Science http://www.angio.net/ I do not accept unsolicited commercial email. Do not spam me. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Alex Povolotsky: "Re: jailed virtual https, anyone?"
- Previous message: quak@mydiax.ch: "Re: jailed virtual https, anyone?"
- In reply to: Sheldon Hearn: "Re: File table exhaustion patch"
- Next in thread: David Schultz: "Re: File table exhaustion patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]