Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind
From: Jacques A. Vidrine (nectar@FreeBSD.org)
Date: 11/14/02
- Next message: Jack L. Stone: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- Previous message: Jacques A. Vidrine: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- In reply to: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- Next in thread: Masachika ISHIZUKA: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:47:31 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 01:18:14PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> You are thinking of the construct:
>
> cmd1 & cmd2
ITYM `cmd1 & && cmd2', which should never have worked.
However, `cmd1 & cmd2' makes perfect sense.
I think we are wandering off-topic.
Cheers,
-- Jacques A. Vidrine <nectar@celabo.org> http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Jack L. Stone: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- Previous message: Jacques A. Vidrine: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- In reply to: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- Next in thread: Masachika ISHIZUKA: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]