Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind
From: Klaus Steden (klaus@compt.com)
Date: 11/14/02
- Next message: Amit Rao: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- Previous message: Mike Tancsa: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- Next in thread: Andrew J. Korty: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- Reply: Andrew J. Korty: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:29:08 -0500 From: Klaus Steden <klaus@compt.com> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
> At 11:10 AM 14/11/2002 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> >I believe the "&&" construct is now deprecated in FBSD-4.7.....
>
>
> I think you were thinking of && & which is no longer "supported"
>
Isn't '&&' a shell construct? Why would it be deprecated since all it does is
indicate to the shell to run the command immediately following it pending the
successful completion of the command immediately preceding it?
Not to split hairs or anything, but did I miss a meeting or something?
Klaus
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Amit Rao: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- Previous message: Mike Tancsa: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- Next in thread: Andrew J. Korty: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- Reply: Andrew J. Korty: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]