Re: CERT VU#539363
From: Mike Hoskins (mike@adept.org)
Date: 10/17/02
- Next message: twig les: "SSH keeps dying while box seems to be up/PC Weasel?"
- Previous message: Mark Murray: "Re: TCFS for FreeBSD?"
- In reply to: David Schultz: "Re: CERT VU#539363"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:35:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org> To: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU>
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, David Schultz wrote:
> I just read the latter advisory you referred to. It appears to be
> based on the paper by Stephen Gill that it cites, and the author
> of the advisory doesn't seem to realize that the described
> vulnerabilities aren't new or recently discovered.
Yes, they've existed as long as state tables have.
> variants. That said, I still find the problem of intelligently
> managing firewall state very interesting.
That was my primary reason for bringing this to -security. (The second
being to see if we had a readied response.) I knew the issues discussed
were nothing knew, as I think anyone running stateful firewalls has known
for quite some time... I just wanted to see official opinion about our
implementation.
> [1] Paxson, V. Bro: A System for Detecting Network Intruders in
> Real-Time. Berkeley, 1999. ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/papers/bro-CN99.ps.gz
Ahh, the alma matter. Touche, I'm reading it now. ;)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: twig les: "SSH keeps dying while box seems to be up/PC Weasel?"
- Previous message: Mark Murray: "Re: TCFS for FreeBSD?"
- In reply to: David Schultz: "Re: CERT VU#539363"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]