Re: CERT VU#539363
From: Larry Sica (lomifeh@earthlink.net)
Date: 10/17/02
- Next message: Greg Lewis: "Re: TCFS for FreeBSD?"
- Previous message: David Schultz: "Re: CERT VU#539363"
- In reply to: Darren Reed: "Re: CERT VU#539363"
- Next in thread: David Schultz: "Re: CERT VU#539363"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 01:14:34 -0400 From: Larry Sica <lomifeh@earthlink.net> To: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 08:09 PM, Darren Reed wrote:
> In some mail from Mike Hoskins, sie said:
>>
>>
>> I'm sure everyone saw this on Bugtraq, firewalls, firewall-wizards,
>> etc...
>> But I noticed Apple was quick to resond with a 'we're not vulnerable'
>> regarding OS X and wondered if we could draw similar conclusions.
>
> If they don't do stateful filtering then they are not vulnerable.
>
> Guess we know what version of ipfw is/isn't in OSX then, eh ?
>
10.2 does do state.
--Larry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Greg Lewis: "Re: TCFS for FreeBSD?"
- Previous message: David Schultz: "Re: CERT VU#539363"
- In reply to: Darren Reed: "Re: CERT VU#539363"
- Next in thread: David Schultz: "Re: CERT VU#539363"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]