Re: CERT VU#539363

From: Darren Reed (avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au)
Date: 10/17/02 

From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
To: mike@adept.org (Mike Hoskins)
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:09:16 +1000 (Australia/ACT)

In some mail from Mike Hoskins, sie said:
>
>
> I'm sure everyone saw this on Bugtraq, firewalls, firewall-wizards, etc...
> But I noticed Apple was quick to resond with a 'we're not vulnerable'
> regarding OS X and wondered if we could draw similar conclusions.

If they don't do stateful filtering then they are not vulnerable.

Guess we know what version of ipfw is/isn't in OSX then, eh ?

Darren

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message

Relevant Pages

  • Re: CERT VU#539363
    ... >> I'm sure everyone saw this on Bugtraq, firewalls, firewall-wizards, ... >> But I noticed Apple was quick to resond with a 'we're not vulnerable' ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: Next-hop scanning for open firewall ports
    ... In some mail from David G. Andersen, sie said: ... The implementation is not linked to NAT, so firewalls ...
    (Bugtraq)
  • Re: [fw-wiz] Stateful Proxying?
    ... In some email I received from Small, Jim, sie wrote: ... > While talking about Firewalls and Proxies, I was asked, can you have a ...
    (Firewall-Wizards)