Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)
From: Chuck Yerkes (chuck+bsd@sept2002.snew.com)
Date: 08/30/02
- Next message: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: Long RSA keys"
- Previous message: Karsten W. Rohrbach: "Re: Long RSA keys"
- In reply to: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Next in thread: 'Karsten W. Rohrbach': "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 23:18:59 -0700 From: Chuck Yerkes <chuck+bsd@sept2002.snew.com> To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Quoting Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com):
> Mipam <mipam@ibb.net> writes:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:57:55PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> > > >and maybe we should update our rc scripts,
> > > >so that ssh-keygen generates at least 1280 Bit keys
...
> > I dont think its too much overrated and theoretical.
> I do. If someone with millions of dollars to spend on custom designed
> hardware wants to break into your computer, I assure you that
For just 1 million, I'll roll them a tape. Hell, I'll mail it to them.
OTOH, we can certainly use SSH with OPIE.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: Long RSA keys"
- Previous message: Karsten W. Rohrbach: "Re: Long RSA keys"
- In reply to: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Next in thread: 'Karsten W. Rohrbach': "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|