Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)
From: Dave Feustel (dfeustel@mindspring.com)
Date: 08/29/02
- Next message: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Previous message: Karsten W. Rohrbach: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- In reply to: Karsten W. Rohrbach: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Next in thread: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Reply: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Dave Feustel" <dfeustel@mindspring.com> To: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de>, "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:52:43 -0500
> > If you can attack 1024 bit keys cheaply a few months from now, please
> > let us know. Where I live, Moore's law still observes things double
> > every 18 months, not every 18 hours.
See _Cracking DES_
(http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1565925203/qid=1030639763/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-5391104-6813765?v=glance&s=books<tech-security@netbsd.org>, <misc@openbsd.org>
for a (by now obsolete) low-cost home-brew system
for cracking DES. The available FPGA hardware has advanced
considerably since this book was written.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Previous message: Karsten W. Rohrbach: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- In reply to: Karsten W. Rohrbach: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Next in thread: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Reply: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]