Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)
From: Alexandr Kovalenko (never@nevermind.kiev.ua)
Date: 08/29/02
- Next message: Karsten W. Rohrbach: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Previous message: Seth Kurtzberg: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- In reply to: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Next in thread: Chuck Yerkes: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 18:30:06 +0300 From: Alexandr Kovalenko <never@nevermind.kiev.ua> To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Hello, Perry E. Metzger!
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:08:27AM -0400, you wrote:
> > > >and maybe we should update our rc scripts,
> > > >so that ssh-keygen generates at least 1280 Bit keys
> > > I think this is highly overrated and only of theoretical
> > > value for most *BSD users.
> > I dont think its too much overrated and theoretical.
> I do. If someone with millions of dollars to spend on custom designed
> hardware wants to break into your computer, I assure you that
> increasing the size of your ssh keys will not stop them. Nor, for that
> matter, would the slow and tedious process of cracking your ssh keys
> be nearly as efficient as the more pragmatic alternatives.
Much more simplier is to get physical access with those millions of
dollars.
-- NEVE-RIPE Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Karsten W. Rohrbach: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Previous message: Seth Kurtzberg: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- In reply to: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Next in thread: Chuck Yerkes: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]