Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)
From: Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com)
Date: 08/29/02
- Next message: Dave Feustel: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Previous message: David Brownlee: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- In reply to: Petr Swedock: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Next in thread: Petr Swedock: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Reply: Petr Swedock: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Petr Swedock <petr@blade-runner.mit.edu> From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> Date: 29 Aug 2002 10:29:38 -0400
Petr Swedock <petr@blade-runner.mit.edu> writes:
> > I would have thought spending at least hundreds of millions off
> > dollars and (as importantly) at least months of time would have been
> > considered "unattractive" enough to encourage other methods of getting
> > at your data like breaking in to your physical location. Silly me. I
> > guess I missed the concept behind crypto.
>
> The concept behind crypto is to confuse, scramble and obfuscate.
I'm glad you've explained it to me.
> When it was first designed for and employed in computers the existing
> mathematical models, computer muscle and modes of analysis were
> thought to assure unbreakability. Now the use has morphed into
> a race condition where present mathematical models and future
> computer muscle, coupled with existing modes of analysis are
> thought to assure breakability.
So, this means that because a person with a billion in spare change
lying about might (MIGHT!) be able to break a 1024 bit key every year,
we should all panic?
-- Perry E. Metzger perry@piermont.com -- "Ask not what your country can force other people to do for you..." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Dave Feustel: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Previous message: David Brownlee: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- In reply to: Petr Swedock: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Next in thread: Petr Swedock: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Reply: Petr Swedock: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|