Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)
From: Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com)
Date: 08/29/02
- Next message: David Brownlee: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Previous message: Petr Swedock: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- In reply to: Karsten W. Rohrbach: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Next in thread: Karsten W. Rohrbach: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Reply: Karsten W. Rohrbach: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de> From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> Date: 29 Aug 2002 10:15:34 -0400
"Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de> writes:
> tracking the evolution of computing machinery nowadays, implementing
> cryptanalysis in hardware becomes cheaper and faster at an amazing
> speed. my wild guess is, that through the upcoming broad availability of
> software programmable hardware that is available today, attacks to
> crypto in general will become very cheap in a timeframe of months.
If you can attack 1024 bit keys cheaply a few months from now, please
let us know. Where I live, Moore's law still observes things double
every 18 months, not every 18 hours.
Perry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: David Brownlee: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Previous message: Petr Swedock: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- In reply to: Karsten W. Rohrbach: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Next in thread: Karsten W. Rohrbach: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Reply: Karsten W. Rohrbach: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|