Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)
From: Dave Taira (bodhi@hagakure.org)
Date: 08/29/02
- Next message: Mark Murray: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Previous message: Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Maybe in reply to: =?iso-8859-1?B?U3RlZmFuIEty/Gdlcg== ?=: "1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Next in thread: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:58:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Dave Taira <bodhi@hagakure.org> To: Mipam <mipam@ibb.net>
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Mipam wrote:
> A very valid fact. But perhaps a note could be added which addresses
> the info leaving it up to the user what to do?
If it matters to you, then read ssh-keygen(1), change /etc/rc, and
generate new keys.
[ Dave Taira <bodhi@hagakure.org> 2002.08.28/15:58:52 PDT ]
[ Morlock for Hire ]
[ if a hard drive is a bag of beef, inodes are nihilistic fish, swimming ]
[ in darkness. --Andr00 ]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Mark Murray: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Previous message: Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Maybe in reply to: =?iso-8859-1?B?U3RlZmFuIEty/Gdlcg== ?=: "1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Next in thread: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]