Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only
From: Mark Murray (mark@grondar.za)
Date: 08/27/02
- Next message: Ju Ichi: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- In reply to: Ju Ichi: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Next in thread: Ju Ichi: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Reply: Ju Ichi: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Ju Ichi <freebsd-security@ichi.net> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 22:35:33 +0100 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
> I've posted a couple of times recently looking for a solution to what
> I believe is/was a fairly involved, security-related problem. If by
> doing so, I contrubuted to the noise on the list, I am truly sorry.
No Problemo.
> Being fairly new to FreeBSD, I was not sure where to go. So, I
> posted to freebsd-questions first, then to freebsd-net, and finally
> to freebsd-security. The latter is the only one that I received any
> answers from. I really appreciate the answers too! They helped my
> by giving me food for thought and while my problem is not solved, I
> was able to dig into places I didn't know about owing to my being
> fairly new to FreeBSD and the IPSec implmentation/utilities not being
> throughly documented. Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining about
> the lack of documentation. I understand that most everyone is doing
> this out of a love of it and with limited time.
Cool. This gives some pointers for useful ways to proceed.
Are you any good at documenting stuff?
> To cut to the chase, there doesn't seem to be a charter or detailed
> set of guidlines for this list.
Good feedback. I will fix this.
> Without quoting the handbook completely, it says that a) this is a
> list for "security issues", and b) it is a "technical mailing list for
> which strictly technical content is expected." So, even given all the
> discussion, I am unsure as to whether I added to the noise problem or
> not.
A really useful activity is to help compile an FAQ (both the Q and the A).
Wanna contribute? :-)
M
-- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Ju Ichi: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- In reply to: Ju Ichi: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Next in thread: Ju Ichi: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Reply: Ju Ichi: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
