Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only
From: Mark Murray (mark@grondar.za)
Date: 08/27/02
- Next message: Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Previous message: Mark Murray: "Re: Re[2]: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- In reply to: Jens Rehsack: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Next in thread: Jens Rehsack: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Reply: Jens Rehsack: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:36:44 +0100 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
> > I got an overwhelmingly positive (off-list, thanks!) response to my
> > complaint that this list's signal-to-noise ratio was terrible.
>
> For that you should really use a spam filter.
Spam is a small part of the problem. A much larger part is off-topic
chatter.
> > Comments? Suggestions? (Keep it brief and focussed, folks!)
>
> Personally I like the solution on PHP mailing lists. Everybody can
> write mail to a list without having to subscribe. But the sending
> first ever mail to that list you must! allow validating your address
> by responding an auth request like when subscribing to fbsd lists.
How will that stop off-topic chatter?
> This allows to post validated senders only but keeps freedom to all
> people who wants post.
_Less_ freedom is actually needed. It is precisely that freedom which
has allowed the list to become a question-and-answer (or HOWTO) list
that has dropped the signal value so badly.
> I do not like restricted use. The end doesn't justifies the means!
Depends on the "end". Here I mean a dramatic drop in newbie questions
and a consequent increase in the technical content/discussion ratio. I
also hope to attract back the security gurus, and thus further improve
the signal content.
M
-- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Previous message: Mark Murray: "Re: Re[2]: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- In reply to: Jens Rehsack: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Next in thread: Jens Rehsack: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Reply: Jens Rehsack: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|