Re: Linux_Base marked as forbidden. Anyone know when this will be resolved?
From: Mark Murray (mark@grondar.za)
Date: 08/27/02
- Next message: Mark Murray: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Previous message: Mark Murray: "Re: List administrivia, was: Re: I Finally got It 2096"
- In reply to: Jeremy Suo-Anttila: "Linux_Base marked as forbidden. Anyone know when this will be resolved?"
- Next in thread: Mark Murray: "Re: Re[2]: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: jps@funeralexchange.com Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:25:49 +0100 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
> I cvsup'd and was about to install the latest linux_base and i found this.
> Anyone know when this will be resolved i have a few machines that are using
> linux_base7.1 and i would like to upgrade them ASAP.
This is a ports and Linux issue. Please look in
/usr/ports/emulators/linux_base/Makefile for the URL's that contain
the definitive knowlege on this.
M
-- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Mark Murray: "Re: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Previous message: Mark Murray: "Re: List administrivia, was: Re: I Finally got It 2096"
- In reply to: Jeremy Suo-Anttila: "Linux_Base marked as forbidden. Anyone know when this will be resolved?"
- Next in thread: Mark Murray: "Re: Re[2]: Administrivia: Discussion - Making this list subscriber-only"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|