Re: kern/22142: securelevel does not affect mount
From: Jan Srzednicki (winfried@student.uci.agh.edu.pl)
Date: 08/23/02
- Next message: Nomad: "Re: Firewalls on FreeBSD( ipfw vs ipf)"
- Previous message: Lupe Christoph: "FYI: [itojun@iijlab.net: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful]"
- In reply to: Johan Karlsson: "Re: kern/22142: securelevel does not affect mount"
- Next in thread: Lupe Christoph: "Re: kern/22142: securelevel does not affect mount"
- Reply: Lupe Christoph: "Re: kern/22142: securelevel does not affect mount"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 09:43:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Jan Srzednicki <winfried@student.uci.agh.edu.pl> To: Johan Karlsson <johan@FreeBSD.org>
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Johan Karlsson wrote:
> Synopsis: securelevel does not affect mount
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-security
> Responsible-Changed-By: johan
> Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Aug 22 18:41:46 PDT 2002
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> Lets get -security's opinion about this.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=22142
I'm afraid changin securelevel's behaviour would break some system schemes
out there, which is rather unwanted thing for -STABLE. One thing we can do
is to wait for MACs in -CURRENT. Maybe a better solution is to add another
sysctl just form mount? Like kern.mount_disabled, which, when set to 1,
cannot be reverted back.
-- #- Winfried -------- wrzask@IRCNet -||- GG# 3838383 -||- JS500-RIPE -# #- w@dream.vg ---- w@303.krakow.pl -||--- http://violent.dream.vg ---# #- Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers. -# To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Nomad: "Re: Firewalls on FreeBSD( ipfw vs ipf)"
- Previous message: Lupe Christoph: "FYI: [itojun@iijlab.net: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful]"
- In reply to: Johan Karlsson: "Re: kern/22142: securelevel does not affect mount"
- Next in thread: Lupe Christoph: "Re: kern/22142: securelevel does not affect mount"
- Reply: Lupe Christoph: "Re: kern/22142: securelevel does not affect mount"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]