Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:38.signed-error
From: Brad Laue (brad@brad-x.com)
Date: 08/19/02
- Next message: Alfred Perlstein: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:38.signed-error"
- Previous message: Jacques A. Vidrine: "Re: Um, 4.6-RELEASE-p19?"
- In reply to: FreeBSD Security Advisories: "FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:38.signed-error"
- Next in thread: Alfred Perlstein: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:38.signed-error"
- Reply: Alfred Perlstein: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:38.signed-error"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 12:05:11 -0400 From: Brad Laue <brad@brad-x.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>
=============================================================================
> FreeBSD-SA-02:38.signed-error Security
Advisory
> The FreeBSD
Project
>
> Topic: Boundary checking errors involving signed integers
This might be an obtuse question, but I'm going to risk it and ask anyway.
Given that accept(2) and getpeername(2) are vulnerable one would think
this were remotely exploitable, but I'm not familiar enough to say this
for certain.
Is this a remotely exploitable issue, or only local?
Brad
-- // -- http://www.BRAD-X.com/ -- // To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Alfred Perlstein: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:38.signed-error"
- Previous message: Jacques A. Vidrine: "Re: Um, 4.6-RELEASE-p19?"
- In reply to: FreeBSD Security Advisories: "FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:38.signed-error"
- Next in thread: Alfred Perlstein: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:38.signed-error"
- Reply: Alfred Perlstein: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:38.signed-error"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|