Re: Re[2]: About the openssl hole
From: Scott Lambert (lambert@lambertfam.org)
Date: 07/30/02
- Next message: FreeBSD Security Advisories: "FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:23.stdio [REVISED]"
- Previous message: Gabriel Ambuehl: "Re[4]: About the openssl hole"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Dirk Meyer: "Re: Re[2]: About the openssl hole"
- Next in thread: Dirk Meyer: "Re: Re[2]: About the openssl hole"
- Reply:(deleted message) Dirk Meyer: "Re: Re[2]: About the openssl hole"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:17:39 -0400 From: Scott Lambert <lambert@lambertfam.org> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 07:52:54PM +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Geir RÜness wrote:
>
> > But as many know, the port of openssl will
> > not completly replace the core open ssl.
> > (You could see this if you build mod_ssl)
>
> apache13-modssl will see and use an installed
> port of openssl in /usr/local
But if you install the openssl port with -DOPENSSL_OVERWRITE_BASE, the
ports should simply see the "base" install of openssl and use it that
way, no?
Do openssl using programs need to be recompiled for library changes
between OpenSSL 0.9.6a and OpenSSL 0.9.6d? ssh, sendmail, postfix,
stunnel, various pop3 and imap daemons, apache, ....?
-- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin lambert@lambertfam.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: FreeBSD Security Advisories: "FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:23.stdio [REVISED]"
- Previous message: Gabriel Ambuehl: "Re[4]: About the openssl hole"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Dirk Meyer: "Re: Re[2]: About the openssl hole"
- Next in thread: Dirk Meyer: "Re: Re[2]: About the openssl hole"
- Reply:(deleted message) Dirk Meyer: "Re: Re[2]: About the openssl hole"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|