Re: Re[2]: About the openssl hole
From: Geir Råness (pulz@pulz.no)
Date: 07/30/02
- Next message: Gabriel Ambuehl: "Re[4]: About the openssl hole"
- Previous message: Shunichi Konno: "Re: About the openssl hole"
- In reply to: Gabriel Ambuehl: "Re[2]: About the openssl hole"
- Next in thread: Gabriel Ambuehl: "Re[4]: About the openssl hole"
- Reply: Gabriel Ambuehl: "Re[4]: About the openssl hole"
- Reply:(deleted message) Dirk Meyer: "Re: Re[2]: About the openssl hole"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Geir Råness <pulz@pulz.no> To: <gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 18:56:12 +0200
I talked with an freind of mine who tried this solution, and he told me that it where only one patch that failed.
If you remove the patch "patch-ah" the build will go fine.
But as many know, the port of openssl will not completly replace the core openssl.
(You could see this if you build mod_ssl)
So the best thing is to wait for en offical patch.
Best Regards
Geir Råness
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gabriel Ambuehl" <gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch>
To: "Geir Råness" <pulz@pulz.no>
Cc: <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 6:37 PM
Subject: Re[2]: About the openssl hole
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Hello Geir,
>
> Tuesday, July 30, 2002, 6:26:05 PM, you wrote:
>
> > I cant do that, but you could easy edit the old port your self and
> fix it that way.
>
> Well I tried to do that... It's just that openssl.org is practically
> down (you know what I mean...) and thus I was pretty much out of luck
>
> > It's your own choice what to do, if you want to risk it do so.
>
> I would have risked it (in any case, it's still better to kill SSL
> services myself trying to defend from the blackhats than having the
> blackhats destroying everything...)
>
> > If not, wait for the freebsd team to make an patch for us.
>
> That's more or less what I'm doing now.
>
> > If you take a quick look at the current branch you will se that
> > the openssl is changed to 0.9.6.e, but as we know, current branch
> aint so stable.
>
> I'll have another shot at current once the TrustedBSD stuff is in
> cause I really want to have ACLs ASAP but running it in production is
> entirely out of question right now.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Gabriel
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 6.0.2i
>
> iQEVAwUBPUayoMZa2WpymlDxAQHS2wf9GgUFkA3eI2rSJlKYynsnzisode50bYdW
> TINnOJW/8mYYUBTiIXDLYZ6Xt+ZZhu+0LzlCQcu9XvgHnxsabDztUYAdGt/XCmde
> BAUysjmfoRR9FlUEjK9brovds/LKiKODoBSmN2LUSnPDUm0V0ojJbezfQPiRIEmc
> yHa4cKxWJoMq4gRNRTOCLr2rwVe78rbK1xw3ICe+Z0cDUzJX8VzZijKfzY39aZ9L
> OPSMdLQ0cJf1ASsJRthNRqzHc299oVdNbRoFia1AR9p1fpaN2u/0qu/9GxQQtYKY
> T4z17Enao5A8Htf2tJcWZ1/+AXkJ639/gsYUflfV7HgLruEKAwIYoA==
> =nLA8
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Gabriel Ambuehl: "Re[4]: About the openssl hole"
- Previous message: Shunichi Konno: "Re: About the openssl hole"
- In reply to: Gabriel Ambuehl: "Re[2]: About the openssl hole"
- Next in thread: Gabriel Ambuehl: "Re[4]: About the openssl hole"
- Reply: Gabriel Ambuehl: "Re[4]: About the openssl hole"
- Reply:(deleted message) Dirk Meyer: "Re: Re[2]: About the openssl hole"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|