Dear god not another *BSD debate (was - hiding OS name)

From: twig les (twigles@yahoo.com)
Date: 07/09/02


Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: twig les <twigles@yahoo.com>
To: security@FreeBSD.ORG

The subject is self-explanatory.

--- Alex <freebsd-reply@akruijff.dds.nl> wrote:
> Hello/Beste Jeremy,
>
> Tuesday, July 09, 2002, 5:52:43 PM, you wrote:
>
> JSA> Just because the firewall is OpenBSD do NOT
> make it anymore secure then a
> JSA> well tuned and hardened FreeBSD box. The box is
> only as secure as the
> JSA> administrator maintaining it.
>
> OpenBSD had earned it reputation on security. It
> score a little better
> then FreeBSD on this topic. At the very least you
> have less possibility
> of a insecure system. OpenBSD would be the best
> general choice
> for a firewall and FreeBSD would be the best choice
> of any other intel
> based computer. NetBSD would cover anything that is
> not supported.
> The different version of BSD exist for a reason.
>
> The principle bind the original suggestion is to
> have a firewall with
> a different OS on it.
>
> --
> Best regards/Met vriendelijke groet,
> Alex
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of
> the message

=====
-----------------------------------------------------------
All warfare is based on deception.
-----------------------------------------------------------

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message



Relevant Pages

  • Re: RX (download) limit problem
    ... > I've been seeing a strange problem with my 5.4-STABLE freebsd ... > behind it or the firewall itself) can get a decent rate. ... > In talking to some openBSD guys we had a theory that it might be something ... > the upload and download being kept symmetric and hence so low on the ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • dmz server setup - opinions
    ... firewall will pull data from it to later process. ... Originally i was thinking of using OpenBSD, as it seems to lend itself very ... use FreeBSD, i could jail each process, granted i could also chroot each process ... rsyncd running, only allowing access from the internal network. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: dmz server setup - opinions
    ... >> I realize this may be partial religion and then potentially bias due ... >> services from behind a firewall will pull data from it to later ... >> if i were to use FreeBSD, i could jail each process, granted i could ... >> also chroot each process in OpenBSD and httpd is already done for me. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re[2]: : hiding OS name
    ... JSA> well tuned and hardened FreeBSD box. ... OpenBSD had earned it reputation on security. ... for a firewall and FreeBSD would be the best choice of any other intel ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: : hiding OS name
    ... > JSA> well tuned and hardened FreeBSD box. ... The box is only as secure as the ... > OpenBSD had earned it reputation on security. ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)