Re: SSH Patches
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav (des@ofug.org)
Date: 07/01/02
- Next message: Eric Anderson: "Re: SSH Patches"
- Previous message: Dag-Erling Smorgrav: "Re: security risk: ktrace(2) in FreeBSD prior to -current."
- In reply to: Joao Schim: "Re: SSH Patches"
- Next in thread: Eric Anderson: "Re: SSH Patches"
- Reply: Eric Anderson: "Re: SSH Patches"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Joao Schim <joao@bowtie.nl> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Date: 01 Jul 2002 15:36:23 +0200
Joao Schim <joao@bowtie.nl> writes:
> You mean that the other bugs Theo de Raadt spoke about (those 5600 lines)
> don't concern FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE ?
>
> iirc there were more issues than just those pointed out by ISS.
Theo has an agenda. His actions and words are intended to serve that
agenda, not the needs of FreeBSD users. Your confusion arises from
failure to recognize the gap between the two.
Note that I'm not bashing Theo here. He did what he could to extract
some positive publicity out of what was effectively a PR disaster for
OpenBSD, engineered by ISS (who also have their agenda.) He got
caught between a rock and a hard place and tried to make the most out
of a rotten situation... no matter how much I disapprove of the
ensuing circus, I can't really blame him for trying to defend himself,
though I still think he went a little too far.
DES
-- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Eric Anderson: "Re: SSH Patches"
- Previous message: Dag-Erling Smorgrav: "Re: security risk: ktrace(2) in FreeBSD prior to -current."
- In reply to: Joao Schim: "Re: SSH Patches"
- Next in thread: Eric Anderson: "Re: SSH Patches"
- Reply: Eric Anderson: "Re: SSH Patches"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|