Re: libc flaw: BIND 9 closes most holes but also opens one
From: Gregory Neil Shapiro (gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG)
Date: 06/30/02
- Next message: Kent Stewart: "FreeBSD.Scalper.Worm"
- Previous message: Cyrille Lefevre: "Re: bin/22212: skeyaccess(3) doesn't for primary group"
- In reply to: Brett Glass: "Re: libc flaw: BIND 9 closes most holes but also opens one"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 21:59:37 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
>> Only if you're using something that links against it. IMO you're better
>> off just not having [libbind] around.
brett> Some things link with it. I believe that Sendmail is among them.
No, sendmail is quite happy with the libc resolver. Sure you can make it
link with libbind (or any other library you feel like throwing in there :)
if you wish, but it isn't necessary.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Kent Stewart: "FreeBSD.Scalper.Worm"
- Previous message: Cyrille Lefevre: "Re: bin/22212: skeyaccess(3) doesn't for primary group"
- In reply to: Brett Glass: "Re: libc flaw: BIND 9 closes most holes but also opens one"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
