Re: libc flaw: BIND 9 closes most holes but also opens one
From: Brett Glass (brett@lariat.org)
Date: 06/29/02
- Next message: Doug Barton: "Re: libc flaw: BIND 9 closes most holes but also opens one"
- Previous message: Brett Glass: "Re: libc flaw: BIND 9 closes most holes but also opens one"
- In reply to: Doug Barton: "Re: libc flaw: BIND 9 closes most holes but also opens one"
- Next in thread: Gregory Neil Shapiro: "Re: libc flaw: BIND 9 closes most holes but also opens one"
- Reply: Gregory Neil Shapiro: "Re: libc flaw: BIND 9 closes most holes but also opens one"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 15:52:12 -0600 To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.ORG> From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
At 03:44 PM 6/29/2002, Doug Barton wrote:
> Non sequitur. I was responding to your claim that libbind was fixed
>only in 8.3.3. You are categorically wrong on that point.
Not unless ISC is lying, which of course it would have no
reason to do. See
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bind-announce&m=102527570707030&w=2
which says that libbind was fixed between 8.3.2 and 8.3.3.
> Only if you're using something that links against it. IMO you're better
>off just not having [libbind] around.
Some things link with it. I believe that Sendmail is among them.
--Brett
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Doug Barton: "Re: libc flaw: BIND 9 closes most holes but also opens one"
- Previous message: Brett Glass: "Re: libc flaw: BIND 9 closes most holes but also opens one"
- In reply to: Doug Barton: "Re: libc flaw: BIND 9 closes most holes but also opens one"
- Next in thread: Gregory Neil Shapiro: "Re: libc flaw: BIND 9 closes most holes but also opens one"
- Reply: Gregory Neil Shapiro: "Re: libc flaw: BIND 9 closes most holes but also opens one"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|