libc resolver fix: can we applied to 3-stable or before?
From: Makoto Matsushita (matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Date: 06/29/02
- Next message: bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com: "ezmlm response"
- Previous message: bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com: "ezmlm response"
- Next in thread: Brett Glass: "Re: libc resolver fix: can we applied to 3-stable or before?"
- Reply: Brett Glass: "Re: libc resolver fix: can we applied to 3-stable or before?"
- Reply: Doug Barton: "Re: libc resolver fix: can we applied to 3-stable or before?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: security@FreeBSD.org Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 13:06:07 +0900
Simple question: Is our 3-stable libc vulnerable? If so, can we apply
the same patch to RELENG_3 also? If 3-stable libc is vulnerable, our
compat3x/libc.so.3.uu bundled with 4-stable (and 5-stable in the
future) is also vulnerable, and it would be good to fix.
Note that same stories are also applied to libc of 2.2-stable or before.
-- -
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com: "ezmlm response"
- Previous message: bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com: "ezmlm response"
- Next in thread: Brett Glass: "Re: libc resolver fix: can we applied to 3-stable or before?"
- Reply: Brett Glass: "Re: libc resolver fix: can we applied to 3-stable or before?"
- Reply: Doug Barton: "Re: libc resolver fix: can we applied to 3-stable or before?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]