Re: Nmap/Snort
From: faSty (fasty@i-sphere.com)
Date: 05/30/02
- Next message: Wijnand: "ipv6 in a jail"
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Nmap/Snort"
- In reply to: nathan skains: "re: Nmap/Snort"
- Next in thread: Chris: "Re: Nmap/Snort"
- Reply: Chris: "Re: Nmap/Snort"
- Reply: John Ruff: "Re: Nmap/Snort"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 01:38:44 -0700 From: faSty <fasty@i-sphere.com> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
113 port is identd usually for IRC or some reason.
587 is for sendmail's submission
-trev
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 02:42:32AM -0500, nathan skains wrote:
> yep i am scanning my self via root. the port that was up on the first scan
> then i scan again seconds later and it was gone.
> not really sure. but i am also concern about these ports
> 113/tcp open auth
> 587/tcp open submission
>
> any way to close them... I am still in the learning process of freebsd so i
> have search google and have not found anything about these ports
> Thanks
> Nate
-- Vail's Second Axiom: The amount of work to be done increases in proportion to the amount of work already completed. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Wijnand: "ipv6 in a jail"
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Nmap/Snort"
- In reply to: nathan skains: "re: Nmap/Snort"
- Next in thread: Chris: "Re: Nmap/Snort"
- Reply: Chris: "Re: Nmap/Snort"
- Reply: John Ruff: "Re: Nmap/Snort"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|