Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip
From: Benjamin Krueger (benjamin@macguire.net)
Date: 04/19/02
- Next message: Nate Williams: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip"
- Previous message: Doug Barton: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip"
- In reply to: Nate Williams: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip"
- Next in thread: Nate Williams: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip"
- Reply: Nate Williams: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:08:46 -0700 From: Benjamin Krueger <benjamin@macguire.net> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
* Nate Williams (nate@yogotech.com) [020418 18:03]:
> > FreeBSD currently does not enable easy maintainance between critical release
> > points for large server environments. Using cvsup to maintain source builds
> > for environments like these ( say 400 servers or more ) is not only
> > unacceptable without an on staff developer and release engineer, it is
> > infeasible.
> >
> > For those of you who would be quick to note that "Corporations with
> > 400 servers should be able to afford a developer and release engineer"
> > please note that 400 NT, Solaris, AIX, or HP-UX servers can be
> > maintained by a small team of administrators, and do not require these
> > extra resources.
>
> So, for 400 NT, Solaris, AIX, or HP-UX servers you allow a small team,
> and for FreeBSD you don't even allow a single engineer? Seems kind of a
> double standard.
>
> And as a long-time administrator, I disagree that FreeBSD is more
> difficult to maintain releases across systems. I've done Ultrix, SunOS,
> Solaris, FreeBSD, and (ack!) Linux, and I find that FreeBSD is second to
> Solaris, but barely so.
>
> However, Solaris doesn't even provide anything remotely close to what
> Brett is asking, and they're getting paid alot for the OS than FreeBSD
> is getting paid.
>
> Nate
I think you misunderstood. I meant you don't need release engineers for
any of the above, only FreeBSD. FreeBSD might be great, but it doesn't admin
itself yet. ;) Consider 4 sysadmins, and 2 release engineers for FreeBSD, as
opposed to just 4 sysadmins for NT / Solaris / AIX / HP-UX.
-- Benjamin Krueger "Life is far too important a thing ever to talk seriously about." - Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Send mail w/ subject 'send public key' or query for (0x251A4B18) Fingerprint = A642 F299 C1C1 C828 F186 A851 CFF0 7711 251A 4B18 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Nate Williams: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip"
- Previous message: Doug Barton: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip"
- In reply to: Nate Williams: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip"
- Next in thread: Nate Williams: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip"
- Reply: Nate Williams: "Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|