RE: another natd question

From: Asenchi (asenchi@asenchi.com)
Date: 04/04/02 

From: "Asenchi" <asenchi@asenchi.com>
To: "Nickolay A.Kritsky" <nkritsky@internethelp.ru>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 10:19:06 -0500

Thank you for your answer, but I can't seem to find any case of two
instances of natd running.

would this be listed in ps?

if anyone could give me some places that i should look at as far as finding
two instances of natd.

thank you all for your help,

ASENCHI

-----Original Message-----
From: Nickolay A. Kritsky [mailto:nkritsky@internethelp.ru]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:28 PM
To: Asenchi
Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD. ORG
Subject: Re: another natd question

Hello Asenchi,

Thursday, April 04, 2002, 1:41:27 AM, you wrote:

A> thank you to all who responded to my question earlier.

A> i have another quesiton about natd. when i startup the machine in the
boot
A> messages i get this:

A> Starting local daemons: natd: Unable to bind divert socket.: Address
already
A> in use.

This probably means that you start two instances of natd. Check your
rc scripts (man rc)

A> I have always gotten this actually, I just haven't been curious enough
til
A> now to ask about it.

A> Thanks for any help you can give,

A> ASENCHI

;-------------------------------------------
; NKritsky
; mailto:nkritsky@internethelp.ru

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message

Relevant Pages

  • RE: natd question
    ... Subject: natd question ... which is the external interface and connects to a router which connects ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • RE: another natd question
    ... What port are you diverting to in your natd.cf? ... On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Asenchi wrote: ... > instances of natd running. ... > Subject: Re: another natd question ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: Is the technique described in this article do-able with
    ... >Even if it were in a comatose state, you might have some problems with ... >using natd since your userland is gone. ... with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: ipfw/natd problem?
    ... Anyway I can suppress these / log them instead? ... >> ipfw and natd as part of the kernel. ... with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: firewall
    ... On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, alexus wrote: ... > man ipfw and man natd ... with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)