Re: Why update the world because of OpenSSH?
From: Christopher Schulte (schulte+freebsd@nospam.schulte.org)
Date: 04/01/02
- Next message: Jason Stone: "Re: It's time for those 2048-, 3072-, and 4096-bit keys?"
- Previous message: David Syphers: "Re: Why update the world because of OpenSSH?"
- In reply to: Larry Vaden: "Re: Why update the world because of OpenSSH?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 00:47:52 -0600 To: Larry Vaden <vaden@texoma.net>, Nathan Reilly <nathan@bbuzzed.cx> From: Christopher Schulte <schulte+freebsd@nospam.schulte.org>
At 12:35 AM 4/1/2002 -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
>Am I correct in assuming that RELENG_4_5 changes from time to time?
Yup. Whenever critical (security) changes are committed.
>If that is the case, how does one build 4.5-RELEASEp2 without the exposure
>of mods since that release?
The current state of RELENG_4_5 is 4.5-RELEASE-p2. That basically means
there have been 2 changes to RELENG_4_5 since 4.5-RELEASE came to be. As
soon as another commit is made, it will be known as 4.5-RELEASE-p3. You
simply synchronize to RELENG_4_5 and get the most current -px state.
/usr/src/UPDATING documents the changes made, once you cvsup your sources.
>thnx/ldv
-- Christopher Schulte http://www.schulte.org/ Do not un-munge my @nospam.schulte.org email address. This address is valid. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Jason Stone: "Re: It's time for those 2048-, 3072-, and 4096-bit keys?"
- Previous message: David Syphers: "Re: Why update the world because of OpenSSH?"
- In reply to: Larry Vaden: "Re: Why update the world because of OpenSSH?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
