Re: options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN

From: Bill Fumerola (billf@mu.org)
Date: 01/13/02 

Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 16:17:49 -0800
From: Bill Fumerola <billf@mu.org>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>

On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 04:32:52PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:

> You've never run an IRC server, have you?

is that the requirement for commenting? ok, i don't see any reasons why
this is a kernel option when the exact same functionality is available
from both firewall facilities we currently ship. 

-- 
- bill fumerola / fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org / billf@mu.org
- my anger management counselor can beat up your self-affirmation therapist
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Re-use the argument?
    ... commenting further. ... I am simply pointing out that though there may be no objection to ... other reasons to object to re-using it. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Re-use the argument?
    ... commenting further. ... I am simply pointing out that though there may be no objection to ... other reasons to object to re-using it. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN
    ... >> You've never run an IRC server, ... > is that the requirement for commenting? ... DES ... with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: data structure question - object data?
    ... I hope you get an answer to this Paul, 'cos I'm interested for many ... of the same reasons that you give. ... Regards ... (commenting in case no-one else does...) ...
    (microsoft.public.fox.vfp.dbc)
  • Re: data structure question - object data?
    ... I hope you get an answer to this Paul, 'cos I'm interested for many ... of the same reasons that you give. ... Regards ... (commenting in case no-one else does...) ...
    (microsoft.public.fox.programmer.exchange)