Re: options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN
From: Paulius Bulotas (paulius@kaktusas.org)
Date: 12/17/01
- Next message: Tim J. Robbins: "Re: options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN"
- Previous message: Tim J. Robbins: "Re: options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN"
- In reply to: Tim J. Robbins: "Re: options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN"
- Next in thread: Tim J. Robbins: "Re: options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN"
- Reply: Tim J. Robbins: "Re: options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:34:32 +0200 From: Paulius Bulotas <paulius@kaktusas.org> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
On 01 12 17, Tim J. Robbins wrote:
> > Anyone can explain, why enabling this option is wrong on web server?
> way handshake. I gather that it's more efficient if you have lots of
> quick connects and disconnects as you do with HTTP when not using the
> keepalive features.
Ok, so I should disable keep alive in Apache and enable SYN+FIN (disable
option ;), then I'll get faster connects.?. but how many clients (OSes) use
this rfc? None? or they should be enabled somehow?
Paulius
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Tim J. Robbins: "Re: options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN"
- Previous message: Tim J. Robbins: "Re: options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN"
- In reply to: Tim J. Robbins: "Re: options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN"
- Next in thread: Tim J. Robbins: "Re: options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN"
- Reply: Tim J. Robbins: "Re: options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]