Re: philosophical question...
From: Brooks Davis (brooks@one-eyed-alien.net)
Date: 12/03/01
- Next message: Holtor: "OpenSSH"
- Previous message: Tariq Rashid: "isakmpd cpu hog: fix?"
- In reply to: Oleg Cherkasov: "Re: philosophical question..."
- Next in thread: Zachary M. Smith: "Re: philosophical question..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 07:07:16 -0800 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Oleg Cherkasov <Oleg.Cherkasov@mail.com>
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 02:57:55PM +0100, Oleg Cherkasov wrote:
>
> Yes, you are right, it is better to keep it out of the kernel. But except
> having /etc/malloc.conf, is it better to have a shell variable MEMORY_RANDOM
> or MALLOC_CONF? In this case just 'weak' services can be run with that
> option on. We still do not know how will it affect performance ... because
> it will be additional cycles during memory allocation for every single
> *alloc() call. Some software could be very aggressive using malloc(), who
> knows.
The MALLOC_OPTIONS variable would allow this. Please RFTM before
posting.
-- Brooks
-- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Next message: Holtor: "OpenSSH"
- Previous message: Tariq Rashid: "isakmpd cpu hog: fix?"
- In reply to: Oleg Cherkasov: "Re: philosophical question..."
- Next in thread: Zachary M. Smith: "Re: philosophical question..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|