Re: OT: package management (was: Re: Updating ssh)
From: Brett Glass (brett@lariat.org)
Date: 11/29/01
- Next message: Brett Glass: "Re: sshd exploit"
- Previous message: Emre Bastuz: "sshd: rcvd big packet ?"
- In reply to: The Anarcat: "OT: package management (was: Re: Updating ssh)"
- Next in thread: Peter Radcliffe: "Re: OT: package management (was: Re: Updating ssh)"
- Reply: Peter Radcliffe: "Re: OT: package management (was: Re: Updating ssh)"
- Reply: Matt Piechota: "Re: OT: package management (was: Re: Updating ssh)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:52:27 -0700 To: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.dyndns.org> From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
At 12:27 PM 11/29/2001, The Anarcat wrote:
>I must admit that while I agree that the distinction between /usr and
>/usr/local must be kept, there is a problem with the way the base system
>is laid out from installation.
>
>We have no record of base system installed files as we have for third
>party packages.
>
>And there is a solution: we have a package management suite, we should
>use it to package the base system.
I really do like this idea.
--Brett
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Brett Glass: "Re: sshd exploit"
- Previous message: Emre Bastuz: "sshd: rcvd big packet ?"
- In reply to: The Anarcat: "OT: package management (was: Re: Updating ssh)"
- Next in thread: Peter Radcliffe: "Re: OT: package management (was: Re: Updating ssh)"
- Reply: Peter Radcliffe: "Re: OT: package management (was: Re: Updating ssh)"
- Reply: Matt Piechota: "Re: OT: package management (was: Re: Updating ssh)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
