RE: NAI VirusScan [was: probable virus]
From: Brandon Harper (lists-inet@booms.net)
Date: 10/30/01
- Next message: Mike Tancsa: "RE: NAI VirusScan [was: probable virus]"
- Previous message: Timothy S. Bowers: "Re: this is getting ridiculous"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: probable virus"
- Next in thread: Mike Tancsa: "RE: NAI VirusScan [was: probable virus]"
- Reply: Mike Tancsa: "RE: NAI VirusScan [was: probable virus]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Brandon Harper" <lists-inet@booms.net> To: <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 12:39:47 -0700
>
>
> Just to followup, the daily dat file seems to be working fine.
> Anyone out
> there using it on a regular basis, I would be interested in hearing your
> experiences.
>
> ---Mike
>
Mike--
I'm also using UVScan and know that my definition files are getting updated
daily via cron, and it hasn't been catching these latest virii either. I
also had someone privately e-mail me who said it wasn't working for them
either yesterday. I'm using version 4.x, and have the latest dat file:
bash-2.04# ls -la dat*.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2222080 Oct 23 21:15 dat-4167.tar
bash-2.04# ls -la scan.dat
-rwxr--r-- 1 root wheel 1543967 Oct 23 22:15 scan.dat
It did however catch a W95.Hybris.gen message yesterday (the
haha@sexyfun.net worm), so the problem seems to be related to the
definitions for UVScan itself.
- Brandon
<!-- http://www.booms.net -->
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Mike Tancsa: "RE: NAI VirusScan [was: probable virus]"
- Previous message: Timothy S. Bowers: "Re: this is getting ridiculous"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: probable virus"
- Next in thread: Mike Tancsa: "RE: NAI VirusScan [was: probable virus]"
- Reply: Mike Tancsa: "RE: NAI VirusScan [was: probable virus]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]