Re: using dump for backups.
From: Rob Simmons (email@example.com)
- Next message: Crist J. Clark: "Re: using dump for backups."
- Previous message: The Psychotic Viper: "Re: KLD detectors"
- In reply to: Hassan Halta: "using dump for backups."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 21:28:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Rob Simmons <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: Hassan Halta <email@example.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Using dump locally to a tape, or other device is safe. Using rdump and
enabling rsh on a remote machine to dump to a device on that machine can
be unsafe due to rsh, not dump itself.
If you need to dump to a remote device, you can use ssh to make it safer.
You can also look into using Amanda, which can use Kerberos to make the
remote dumps safer as well. Amanda can use tar as well. As far as Amanda
is concerned, dump and tar are interchangeable. Also, unfortunately the
port for Amanda in the ports collection does not have options for
Kerberos. You will need to look at the configure options to Amanda, and
extract the proper configure switches, and add them yourself to
CONFIGURE_ARGS (of course, after adding MAKE_KERBEROS4=yes to your
As far as I know, Amanda only works with krb4, not krb5 yet. I could be
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Hassan Halta wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was thinking of using dump/restore way to backup files on the system. I
> heard sometime ago that FreeBSD dump was insecure. So, I am wondering if
> this is still the case, and how insecure it is, or what the fixes for it?
> I would like to know more about it if possible,
> Thanks a lot,
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message