Re: Jail vs Active FTP
From: Attila Nagy (bra@fsn.hu)
Date: 10/11/01
- Next message: Jerry Murdock: "Re: Jail vs Active FTP"
- Previous message: Jerry Murdock: "Jail vs Active FTP"
- In reply to: Jerry Murdock: "Jail vs Active FTP"
- Next in thread: Jerry Murdock: "Re: Jail vs Active FTP"
- Reply: Jerry Murdock: "Re: Jail vs Active FTP"
- Reply: Jerry Murdock: "Squid Inside a Jail - DNS Errors!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 21:03:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> To: Jerry Murdock <jerry_murdock@yahoo.com>
Hello,
> When initiating an FTP transfer use "ftp" inside the jail, I get an
> "500 Invalid Port Command" error. Should I be able to initiate and
> active FTP session from inside a jail?
I often run jails with 127/8 IPs or private (non-routable intranet)
addressess.
The easiest solution is to put IPF into the kernel and use its built-in
FTP proxy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attila Nagy e-mail: Attila.Nagy@fsn.hu
Budapest Polytechnic (BMF.HU) @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
H-1084 Budapest, Tavaszmezo u. 15-17. cell.: +3630 306 6758
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Jerry Murdock: "Re: Jail vs Active FTP"
- Previous message: Jerry Murdock: "Jail vs Active FTP"
- In reply to: Jerry Murdock: "Jail vs Active FTP"
- Next in thread: Jerry Murdock: "Re: Jail vs Active FTP"
- Reply: Jerry Murdock: "Re: Jail vs Active FTP"
- Reply: Jerry Murdock: "Squid Inside a Jail - DNS Errors!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]