Re: new ipfw command

From: The Anarcat (anarcat@anarcat.dyndns.org)
Date: 10/03/01 

Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 12:28:52 -0400
From: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.dyndns.org>
To: Chad David <davidc@acns.ab.ca>

On Tue Oct 02, 2001 at 11:44:38PM -0600, Chad David wrote:
>
> 4) The code is modular enough to be useful to someone who
> didn't write it.

And I like this one.. :) Currently, ipfw has a good amount of prs open
that are not commited or fixed. I htink this might be due to the
spaghetti nature of the code.

Having a clean implementation woulnd't hurt at all, go for it!

I'm not sure it would make it in the base system though. :(

A.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ipfw question
    ... > I have the following lines in my firewall config file (fragment from ipfw ... > local.ip:49160 in via dc0 ... with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: SSH or Telnet?
    ... ipfw rules are preferable to /etc/hosts.allow rules, ... I worry about my child and the Internet all the time, ... Here's what I worry about. ... with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: SSH or Telnet?
    ... And also ipfw is a good habit to pick up because it is preferable ... because not every service supports tcpwrappers. ... Here's what I worry about. ... with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: pf OR ipf ?
    ... with the fact that there are now three filters (ipfw, ... with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: ipf / ipfw Which to use?
    ... > I've been playing with both of these and I was wondering why are both ... Ipfilter is multiplatform, ipfw is ... with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
Quantcast