Re: Possible New Security Tool For FreeBSD, Need Your Help.
From: Alfred Perlstein (bright@mu.org)
Date: 08/31/01
- Next message: Rob Simmons: "Re: Possible New Security Tool For FreeBSD, Need Your Help."
- Previous message: Rob Simmons: "Re: Possible New Security Tool For FreeBSD, Need Your Help."
- In reply to: Rob Simmons: "Re: Possible New Security Tool For FreeBSD, Need Your Help."
- Next in thread: Rob Simmons: "Re: Possible New Security Tool For FreeBSD, Need Your Help."
- Reply: Rob Simmons: "Re: Possible New Security Tool For FreeBSD, Need Your Help."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:53:06 -0500 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Rob Simmons <rsimmons@wlcg.com>
* Rob Simmons <rsimmons@wlcg.com> [010831 16:51] wrote:
> Why not require the incoming packets to be spoofed from a preordained set
> of IP addresses to obfuscate it even more.
Obfuscation isn't security, it is the illusion of it.
-- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Rob Simmons: "Re: Possible New Security Tool For FreeBSD, Need Your Help."
- Previous message: Rob Simmons: "Re: Possible New Security Tool For FreeBSD, Need Your Help."
- In reply to: Rob Simmons: "Re: Possible New Security Tool For FreeBSD, Need Your Help."
- Next in thread: Rob Simmons: "Re: Possible New Security Tool For FreeBSD, Need Your Help."
- Reply: Rob Simmons: "Re: Possible New Security Tool For FreeBSD, Need Your Help."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|