Re: possible?
From: Enkhyl (enkhyl@pobox.com)
Date: 07/21/01
- Next message: faSty: "Re: possible?"
- Previous message: nathan@salvation.unixgeeks.com: "possible?"
- In reply to: nathan@salvation.unixgeeks.com: "possible?"
- Next in thread: faSty: "Re: possible?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 14:04:47 -0700 From: Enkhyl <enkhyl@pobox.com> To: nathan@salvation.unixgeeks.com
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 08:49:42PM -0000, nathan@salvation.unixgeeks.com wrote:
[snip]
> this same exact get request came from several different address as well. such
> as: 128.138.105.172, 202.157.154.126, and a couple of others. any ideas? any
> remote exploits in apache i've missed? i'm running Apache/1.3.19 Server..
This is from the Code Red worm. Take a look at the
threads on Bugtraq and/or Nanog lists.
-- Christopher Nielsen - Metal-wielding pyro techie cnielsen@pobox.com "Any technology indistinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced." --unknown To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: faSty: "Re: possible?"
- Previous message: nathan@salvation.unixgeeks.com: "possible?"
- In reply to: nathan@salvation.unixgeeks.com: "possible?"
- Next in thread: faSty: "Re: possible?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
