Re: IPFW almost works now -> stateful rules
From: Peter Pentchev (roam@orbitel.bg)
Date: 06/14/01
- Next message: anindya: "remote syslog question"
- Previous message: Igor Roshchin: "Re: IPFW almost works now -> stateful rules"
- In reply to: Igor Roshchin: "Re: IPFW almost works now -> stateful rules"
- Next in thread: Crist Clark: "Re: IPFW almost works now -> stateful rules"
- Reply: Crist Clark: "Re: IPFW almost works now -> stateful rules"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 19:45:56 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: Igor Roshchin <str@giganda.komkon.org>
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 11:59:28AM -0400, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
>
> If those rules are all rules you have,
> and I didn't miss any line,
> no ftp would be allowed to go through, since
> there is no rule for the port 21.
> Aren't you mixing something ? ftp is at port 21.
> Port 22 is ssh.
> (Check /etc/services)
>
> However, I am puzzled, how do you manage to establish the initial connect
> at all.
This has been discussed before: his FTP server is listening on a high port.
G'luck,
Peter
-- If this sentence were in Chinese, it would say something else. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: anindya: "remote syslog question"
- Previous message: Igor Roshchin: "Re: IPFW almost works now -> stateful rules"
- In reply to: Igor Roshchin: "Re: IPFW almost works now -> stateful rules"
- Next in thread: Crist Clark: "Re: IPFW almost works now -> stateful rules"
- Reply: Crist Clark: "Re: IPFW almost works now -> stateful rules"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|