Re: IPFW almost works now.
From: Antoine Beaupre (LMC) (Antoine.Beaupre@ericsson.ca)
Date: 06/12/01
- Next message: Antoine Beaupre (LMC): "Re: OT: yet another discussion FTP vs HTTP (was: IPFW almost works now.)"
- Previous message: Jamie Norwood: "Re: OT: yet another discussion FTP vs HTTP (was: IPFW almost works now.)"
- In reply to: Jamie Norwood: "Re: IPFW almost works now."
- Next in thread: Nate Williams: "Re: IPFW almost works now."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Antoine Beaupre (LMC)" <Antoine.Beaupre@ericsson.ca> To: Jamie Norwood <mistwolf@mushhaven.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:02:17 -0400
Jamie Norwood wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:44:02PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>
>><<On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:27:49 -0400, Jamie Norwood <mistwolf@mushhaven.net> said:
>>Balderdash! HTTP and TCP both send files over identical TCP
>>connections, which makes them equally efficient. There really is no
>>reason for FTP to continue to exist (but yet it does).
Actually...
> OK, even not arguing the point, they are still quite different applications.
This is it. The only reason why FTP still exists is because there is no
"standard" command-line HTTP client that can be used as an FTP client.
Same thing on the server side. Although you have mod_put for apache. ;)
> FTP still very much serves a purpose. For one thing, uploading via HTTP is
> excessively non-trivial.
Why? Because (almost) no software was written with that application in mind.
While I would gladly let FTP die in favor of a cleaner (HTTP) and more
secure (HTTPS) alternative, it does indeed serve a purpose: legacy.
A.
-- La sémantique est la gravité de l'abstraction. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Antoine Beaupre (LMC): "Re: OT: yet another discussion FTP vs HTTP (was: IPFW almost works now.)"
- Previous message: Jamie Norwood: "Re: OT: yet another discussion FTP vs HTTP (was: IPFW almost works now.)"
- In reply to: Jamie Norwood: "Re: IPFW almost works now."
- Next in thread: Nate Williams: "Re: IPFW almost works now."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|