Re: Limiting TCP RST Response Packets
From: Liran Dahan (lirandb@netvision.net.il)
Date: 05/31/01
- Next message: Boris: "Re[2]: Limiting TCP RST Response Packets"
- Previous message: Mike Silbersack: "Re: Limiting TCP RST Response Packets"
- Maybe in reply to: Liran Dahan: "Limiting TCP RST Response Packets"
- Next in thread: Boris: "Re[2]: Limiting TCP RST Response Packets"
- Reply: Boris: "Re[2]: Limiting TCP RST Response Packets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Liran Dahan" <lirandb@netvision.net.il> To: <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 23:04:44 +0200
I saw blackhole(4) but i dont really understand it..?
is it useful? And if i use firewall and filter-prohib tcp packets, then what?
>blackhole makes more sense i think. see blackhole(4)
>
>rohrbach@WM:datasink[~]19% cat /etc/sysctl.conf
>net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2
>net.inet.udp.blackhole=1
>
>/k
>
>Rob Simmons(rsimmons@wlcg.com)@2001.05.31 >14:46:09 +0000:
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Boris: "Re[2]: Limiting TCP RST Response Packets"
- Previous message: Mike Silbersack: "Re: Limiting TCP RST Response Packets"
- Maybe in reply to: Liran Dahan: "Limiting TCP RST Response Packets"
- Next in thread: Boris: "Re[2]: Limiting TCP RST Response Packets"
- Reply: Boris: "Re[2]: Limiting TCP RST Response Packets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|