Re: Base system with gcc stack-smashing protector
From: Mixtim (mixtim@home.com)
Date: 05/19/01
- Next message: Olivier Nicole: "Re: AUTH and sendmail"
- Previous message: Hiroaki Etoh: "Base system with gcc stack-smashing protector"
- In reply to: Hiroaki Etoh: "Base system with gcc stack-smashing protector"
- Next in thread: Hiroaki Etoh: "Re: Base system with gcc stack-smashing protector"
- Reply: Hiroaki Etoh: "Re: Base system with gcc stack-smashing protector"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:13:01 -0400 From: Mixtim <mixtim@home.com> To: Hiroaki Etoh <etoh@trl.ibm.co.jp>
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 09:32:27AM +0900, Hiroaki Etoh wrote:
> At last, I have completed GCC extension for protectiong applications
> against stack smashing attack. It works on Intel x86 processor and IBM
> powerpc.
Have you seen Phrack Magazine issue 56, article 5? The title is "Bypassing
StackGuard and StackShield."
"This article is an attempt to demonstrate that it is possible to
exploit stack overflow vulnerabilities on systems secured by
StackGuard or StackShield even in hostile environments (such as when
the stack is non-executable)."
Does your patch address their concerns?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Olivier Nicole: "Re: AUTH and sendmail"
- Previous message: Hiroaki Etoh: "Base system with gcc stack-smashing protector"
- In reply to: Hiroaki Etoh: "Base system with gcc stack-smashing protector"
- Next in thread: Hiroaki Etoh: "Re: Base system with gcc stack-smashing protector"
- Reply: Hiroaki Etoh: "Re: Base system with gcc stack-smashing protector"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|