Re[2]: Connection attempts
From: Lee Smallbone (lee@kechara.net)
Date: 04/21/01
- Next message: Anders Nordby: "Re: imap-uw"
- Previous message: Andrey Zakharchenko: "imap-uw"
- In reply to: Jim Durham: "Re: Connection attempts"
- Next in thread: Michael S Scheidell: "Re: Re[2]: Connection attempts"
- Reply: Michael S Scheidell: "Re: Re[2]: Connection attempts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 10:23:18 +0100 From: Lee Smallbone <lee@kechara.net> To: Jim Durham <durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us>
Hello Jim,
Monday, 23 April 2001, you wrote:
JD> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Michael S Scheidell wrote:
>> In local.freebsd.security, you wrote:
>> >
>> >Script kiddies..just ignore it and get used to it.
>>
>> I don't suggest ignoring the 'kiddies' that walk down the street trying to
>> see if my windows are open either.
>>
>> 80% of these systems have bveen compromized, and the owner doesn't even
>> know it.
>>
>> Wouldn't you like to take these systems off the net?
>> You want one of them to run against your system (if you miss a security
>> bulitin?)
>>
>> its easy enough to log and alert the isp.
>>
>>
JD> I don't know what you folks' experience has been, but I've had
JD> almost no luck with alerting ISPs to these problems. A lot of
JD> this stuff comes from Korea and Chekoslovokia and I get no
JD> responses from the ISPs.
You should see my intrusion database... 93% from Korea, Taiwan and
the likes. The rest from interesting places such as Hungaria. There
is never any response from ISPs. Solution a) grin and bare it (is
that really a solution though?). Solution b) actively firewall
connections from these places (blanket bans are never a great idea
though.)
Solution c) anyone?
This could make for an interesting debate.
Best regards,
Lee Smallbone
lee@kechara.net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Anders Nordby: "Re: imap-uw"
- Previous message: Andrey Zakharchenko: "imap-uw"
- In reply to: Jim Durham: "Re: Connection attempts"
- Next in thread: Michael S Scheidell: "Re: Re[2]: Connection attempts"
- Reply: Michael S Scheidell: "Re: Re[2]: Connection attempts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|