Re: ntp-4.0.99k23?
From: Yuri A. Wolf (subs@ovk.altai.ru)
Date: 04/19/01
- Next message: Dag-Erling Smorgrav: "Re: unknown process"
- Previous message: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group: "Re: ntp-4.0.99k23?"
- In reply to: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group: "Re: ntp-4.0.99k23?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 11:38:48 +0700 (NOVST) From: "Yuri A. Wolf" <subs@ovk.altai.ru> To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> > Is the 1st one vulnerable? Is the 2d one ok?
>
> Both are invulnerable. 4.0.99k_2 is patched by the port (see the files
> directory) to fix the vulnerability. 4.0.99k23 has the patches for the
> vulnerability built into it. In the end both are equivalent.
>
Ok, thank you. Those differences in files directory was the reason of my
question.
-- Yuri Wolf wolf@ovk.altai.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: Dag-Erling Smorgrav: "Re: unknown process"
- Previous message: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group: "Re: ntp-4.0.99k23?"
- In reply to: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group: "Re: ntp-4.0.99k23?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|