Re: Theory Question
From: Jacques A. Vidrine (n@nectar.com)
Date: 04/08/01
- Next message: John Howie: "Re: Theory Question"
- Previous message: Jacques A. Vidrine: "Re: Theory Question"
- In reply to: John Howie: "Re: Theory Question"
- Next in thread: John Howie: "Re: Theory Question"
- Reply: John Howie: "Re: Theory Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 17:39:10 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: John Howie <JHowie@msn.com>
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 02:53:11PM -0700, John Howie wrote:
> In practice a machine with no IP address that just receives packets is not
> likely to be vulnerable. Crist's scenario is not a probable one (as he,
> himself, acknowledges).
Such exploits have been seen in the past, e.g. the tcpdump buffer
overrun. I guess the assumption is that your opponent is more
sophisticated than a script kiddie, and wants something in your
network.
Cheers,
-- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Next message: John Howie: "Re: Theory Question"
- Previous message: Jacques A. Vidrine: "Re: Theory Question"
- In reply to: John Howie: "Re: Theory Question"
- Next in thread: John Howie: "Re: Theory Question"
- Reply: John Howie: "Re: Theory Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|