pam_unix logging patch
From: Ilmar S. Habibulin (ilmar@ints.ru)
Date: 03/31/01
- Next message: Ilmar S. Habibulin: "that's for sshd"
- Previous message: mwlucas@exceptionet.com: "Re: Xircom xe2000, 10/100 PC Card.."
- Next in thread: Ilmar S. Habibulin: "that's for sshd"
- Reply: Ilmar S. Habibulin: "that's for sshd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:17:31 +0400 (MSD) From: "Ilmar S. Habibulin" <ilmar@ints.ru> To: <security@freebsd.org>
Here is a patch for log user logins and logouts, that i made in 15 minutes
while studying login&PAM. Why not to use LOG_AUTH and pam_system_log()
with other usefull pam functions to log different events?
And i don't understand why not to move half of login stuff to pam modules,
or even use only pam without ifdefs?
PS. patch is against -current.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- TEXT/PLAIN attachment: pam_unix.c.patch
- Next message: Ilmar S. Habibulin: "that's for sshd"
- Previous message: mwlucas@exceptionet.com: "Re: Xircom xe2000, 10/100 PC Card.."
- Next in thread: Ilmar S. Habibulin: "that's for sshd"
- Reply: Ilmar S. Habibulin: "that's for sshd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|